\r\n\t\t\t\t
These zones can be further differentiated and expanded accordingly. In addition, the naming of intensity zones is often done differently in different sports. Based on the three-zone model, the investigations focused on the percentage distribution of training time in the respective zones. It was found that a large part of the training was done in\u00a0zone 1. 80-90%<\/span>\u00a0of the training time was spent at low intensity and is referred to as “low intensity training, LIT”. The proportion of training time for world-class athletes was\u00a0negligible in zone 2, only to reach 10-20% again in zone 3<\/span>.<\/p>The term for training in zone 3 is consequently “high intensity training, HIT<\/span>“. For the individually correct determination of the training intensity zones, professional performance diagnostics should again be the means of first resort. The importance of training in zone 2 and the goals and times at which this can still be advisable will be discussed in later blog posts.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t<\/section>\r\n\t\t\t\t